Page 40 of 59
The GW AEM is designed to simulate the change in the groundwater system due to coal resource development directly, not to simulate historical conditions in the Galilee sedimentary basin. Comparison with historical observations of groundwater pressure or fluxes is therefore not possible or warranted. Fitting a complex model to a limited observation dataset that is not designed to inform such exercise, but designed to monitor water resources, will lead to biased parameter estimates which subsequently will lead to biased model predictions (Doherty and Welter, 2010). In this light, the unconstrained suite of parameters employed here are conservative and less prone to bias.
Last updated:
6 December 2018
Summary and download
Product Finalisation date
2018
PRODUCT CONTENTS
- 2.6.2.1 Methods
- 2.6.2.2 Review of existing models
- 2.6.2.2.1 Alpha and Kevin's Corner model review
- 2.6.2.2.2 Carmichael model review
- 2.6.2.2.3 China First model review
- 2.6.2.2.4 China Stone model review
- 2.6.2.2.5 South Galilee model review
- 2.6.2.2.6 Galilee Basin hydrogeological model review
- 2.6.2.2.7 Suitability of existing groundwater models
- References
- Datasets
- 2.6.2.3 Model development
- 2.6.2.4 Boundary and initial conditions
- 2.6.2.5 Implementation of the coal resource development pathway
- 2.6.2.6 Parameterisation
- 2.6.2.7 Observations and predictions
- 2.6.2.8 Uncertainty analysis
- 2.6.2.9 Limitations and conclusions
- Citation
- Acknowledgements
- Currency of scientific results
- Contributors to the Technical Programme
- About this technical product
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT COMPONENT