The regional groundwater analytic element model (GW AEM) is not designed to reproduce historical conditions and can therefore not be constrained by historical observations.
A set of 47 model nodes were selected for which the drawdown (dmax) – the maximum difference in drawdown between the coal resource development pathway (CRDP) and baseline, due to additional coal resource development – and year of maximum change (tmax) were calculated. In addition to this set, more than 500 model nodes were defined for which time series of drawdown for each hydrostratigraphic unit was recorded and stored.
The results of the sensitivity analysis indicate that the most important parameters affecting the drawdown at a model node are the hydraulic properties of the hydrostratigraphic unit in which the model node is located.
Product Finalisation date
- 126.96.36.199 Methods
- 188.8.131.52 Review of existing models
- 184.108.40.206.1 Alpha and Kevin's Corner model review
- 220.127.116.11.2 Carmichael model review
- 18.104.22.168.3 China First model review
- 22.214.171.124.4 China Stone model review
- 126.96.36.199.5 South Galilee model review
- 188.8.131.52.6 Galilee Basin hydrogeological model review
- 184.108.40.206.7 Suitability of existing groundwater models
- 220.127.116.11 Model development
- 18.104.22.168 Boundary and initial conditions
- 22.214.171.124 Implementation of the coal resource development pathway
- 126.96.36.199 Parameterisation
- 188.8.131.52 Observations and predictions
- 184.108.40.206 Uncertainty analysis
- 220.127.116.11 Limitations and conclusions
- Currency of scientific results
- Contributors to the Technical Programme
- About this technical product