Galilee assessment at a glance
This Figure 1). Seven of the 17 identified (Box 1) had sufficient available information to be modelled (Table 1). This assessment is a regional overview of potential on, and to, water-dependent ecological, economic and sociocultural assets, identifying where potential changes in water resources and may occur due to the seven modelled coal mines, and ruling out areas where impacts are very unlikely (less than 5% chance). Governments, industry and the community can then focus on the areas that are potentially impacted and apply local-scale data and modelling when making regulatory, water management and planning decisions.considered the potential on water and due to future coal resource development in the of the in central Queensland (
Headline finding: Cumulative hydrological changes in the Belyando river basin are very likely (greater than 95% chance), and extend farther than previously predicted from impact assessments of individual mines.
Groundwater:in the near-surface due to modelled additional coal resource development occurs in two areas near clusters of coal mines in the east, with an area of 2820 km2 to experience greater than 0.2 m drawdown. Major aquifers of the geological Eromanga Basin (part of the Great Artesian Basin) are not expected to be impacted. See .
Surface water: Modelled additional coal resource development could impact 6285 km of streams (with at least a 5% chance). Of these, most are temporary streams. See.
Ecosystem impacts: In the Figure 1), 8% of groundwater-dependent streams are at some level of risk of ecological and hydrological changes, and 188 have a source aquifer with at least a 5% chance of greater than 0.2 m drawdown due to modelled additional coal resource development. See(
Asset impacts: Of 241 potentially impacted ecological, 148 are relatively ‘more at risk of hydrological changes’. In addition, one right, five economic assets, and four heritage or Indigenous sites are potentially impacted. See
The zone defines the area in the Galilee subregion outside of which impacts are ruled out (seefor details). The assessment of potential impacts from seven modelled mines was therefore focused within this zone, which combines: (i) the area with at least a 5% chance of exceeding 0.2 m drawdown in the near-surface aquifer due to additional coal resource development, and (ii) the area with at least a 5% chance of exceeding thresholds in specified surface water characteristics due to additional coal resource development.
Data: Bioregional Assessment Programme (Dataset 2),
- Executive summary
- Explore this assessment
- About the subregion
- How could coal resource development result in hydrological changes?
- What are the potential hydrological changes?
- What are the potential impacts of additional coal resource development on ecosystems?
- What are the potential impacts of additional coal resource development on water-dependent assets?
- How to use this assessment
- Building on this assessment
- References and further reading
- Contributors to the Technical Programme