About the subregion
The Hunter subregion is part of the Northern Sydney Basin bioregion and includes the major coastal cities of Newcastle and Gosford-Wyong (Figure 2). It is known for its coal mining, power generation, equine and viticulture industries. It includes two Ramsar-listed wetlands and contains part of the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. The total area investigated for this assessment (the assessment extent) is the same as the subregion extent, which covers 17,045 km2.
Potential hydrological changes
Regional-scale hydrological modelling identified changes in groundwater and streamflow due to coal resource development for two futures (Box 1). The baseline future comprises 42 mines (22 open-cut and 20 underground) that were operating in December 2012. The coal resource development pathway (Box 1) was the most likely future for the subregion (as of September 2015) and includes the baseline developments plus 22 additional coal resource developments: 4 new open-cut mines, 2 new underground mines and 16 expansions to existing operations. Surface water and/or groundwater modelling were not undertaken for a small number of these developments. No coal seam gas (CSG) developments exist or are proposed in the subregion.
Additional coal resource development could lead to 19% of the assessment extent experiencing hydrological changes that exceed defined thresholds (Box 4). Outside this zone of potential hydrological change, hydrological changes are not significant, and hence impacts are very unlikely (less than 5% chance).
Modelling indicates potentially large changes in flow regime in Wyong River, Loders Creek, Saddlers Creek, Wollar Creek and a number of ephemeral creeks (Figure 12). Fourteen percent, or 2441 km2, of the assessment extent has at least a 5% chance of greater than 0.2 m drawdown in the regional watertable due to additional coal resource development. Modelling of the Wyong River using local-scale data indicates that large changes in the flow regime are unlikely in that river.
Potential impacts
The two Ramsar-listed wetlands are outside the zone of potential hydrological change and so are very unlikely to be impacted.
Potentially impacted ecosystems in the zone include 102 km2 of groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs) (predominantly rainforests, forested wetlands, and wet and dry sclerophyll forests), and 634 km of perennial and 518 km of intermittent streams.
Modelled changes in ecologically important flows indicate a higher risk to the condition of riverine forested wetlands along the Goulburn River compared to other riverine forested wetlands in the subregion.
Changes in water availability in the Hunter Regulated River at Greta are very likely (greater than 95% chance) to exceed 5 GL per year, but very unlikely to exceed 12 GL per year, over the period 2013 to 2042.
Drawdowns exceeding 2 m due to additional coal resource development are very likely for 13 bores. The number of water supply bores where drawdown exceeds 2 m is very unlikely to be more than 170. Under the NSW Aquifer Interference Policy, ‘make good’ provisions could apply to licensed water holders affected by drawdowns of greater than 2 m. More detailed site-specific studies are needed to review the predicted changes in areas where regional-scale modelling indicates a high probability of large drawdowns.
Almost 140 km2 of the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area is within the zone but most is not predicted to be impacted because it supports vegetation that does not depend on groundwater. About 1.5 km2 of forested wetland in this World Heritage Area could be affected by drawdown due to additional coal resource development.
Results are reported for two potential futures: The difference in results between the coal resource development pathway and baseline is the change that is primarily reported in a bioregional assessment. This change is due to additional coal resource development. The coal resource development pathway for the Hunter subregion was based on information available as of September 2015. However, coal resource developments may change over time or be withdrawn (e.g. in February 2017, the NSW Planning and Assessment Commission rejected the Drayton South Coal Project for the fourth time), or timing of developments may change. Factors such as climate change or land use were held constant between the two futures. Although actual climate or land use may differ, the effect on results is expected to be minimal as the assessment focused on the difference in the results between the coal resource development pathway and baseline. Box 1 Investigating two potential futures
Product Finalisation date
- Executive summary
- Explore this assessment
- About the subregion
- How could coal resource development result in hydrological changes?
- What are the potential hydrological changes?
- What are the potential impacts of additional coal resource development on ecosystems?
- What are the potential impacts of additional coal resource development on water-dependent assets?
- How to use this assessment
- Building on this assessment
- References and further reading
- Datasets
- Contributors to the Technical Programme
- Acknowledgements
- Citation